ALL IN trade show · Montréal · September 16–17, 2026

Hulotech at ALL IN 2026

ALL IN trade show, Montréal, September 16–17, 2026.

Presented by its organizers as Canada's largest AI and tech event. Hulotech takes part to show its work on AI-assisted training under human supervision, and to open conversations.

The public challenge and the interactive demo are already available online: try the challenge →

Professionals in conversation in a convention hall

Illustrative image.

Why Hulotech will be at ALL IN

When AI takes part in the work, what do we know about what a person understands, can verify and can mobilize again?

Hulotech explores how to move from a one-off performance to evidence that accumulates. At the show, we come to present what we observe, what we cannot conclude, and to meet organizations interested in AI-assisted training under human supervision.

Our founder works every day with AI agents able to carry out certain technical tasks well beyond his direct expertise. His challenge is not to become better than them, but to know when to trust them, what evidence to ask for and when to escalate.
Founder's note. A lived experience, not scientific evidence.

Established concepts that Hulotech did not invent: calibrated trust, meaningful human oversight, automation bias, the asymmetry between solving and verifying.

A professional reviewing a document and a screen: validate or verify?

What we will present at the show

Three demonstrations.

Two experiences you can try online right now, and a demonstrator presented by the team.

Public challenge · try it online

Who supervises the AI?

Six situations. You choose how to verify what the AI hands you.

≈ 4 minutes · no score · neither a validated test nor a Hulotech solution.

Try the challenge →
Challenge “Who supervises the AI?”: situation 1 of 6 with its four choices.

Interactive demo · open it online

Output is not capability.

Interactive demo “Output is not capability”.
View the interactive demo →

New tab · large screen recommended

Capability evidence record: “Observed in this context”, what was observed, what remains undemonstrated.

Demonstrator · presented by the team

Capability Evidence: an evidence record, not a score.

Diagnostic → gap → targeted practice → retest → evidence record. A real demonstrator, presented by the Hulotech team. No AI evaluates capability.

See the real state of each component ↓

After the challenge

Are six good answers enough to say that you know how to supervise AI? No.

These six decisions show how you reacted in these situations. They do not prove that you are, or are not, a good supervisor of AI.

A good answer on a test is not necessarily a demonstrated capability. A capability observed in one situation is not automatically demonstrated in another.

  1. Good answer
  2. Good test performance
  3. Transfer observed
  4. Capability across contexts
  5. Real-world capability

Confidence ≠ competence · AI-assisted performance ≠ independent capability · Second AI opinion ≠ independent evidence

This is precisely the problem Hulotech explores.

What this says about our broader work

Four components, one logic.

The challenge and the demonstrator are the visible parts of broader research on learning, evidence state and follow-up over time.

  1. 0

    Starting point

    A real objective, a real person

  2. 01 · Person-centred training

    Student-Based Training

    « What should this person practise next? »

    Initial behaviour · exploration
  3. 02 · Evidence of capability

    Capability Evidence

    « What have we actually observed? »

    Working demonstrator
  4. 03 · Memory of evidence over time

    Cognitive Passport

    « What do we know over time? »

    Existing foundation · not yet connected
  5. 04 · Next learning experience

    Next Best Learning Experience

    « What should happen next? »

    Research direction

Real maturity level

Where each component really stands.

We know something. We do not claim to know more.

Capability Evidence

Working demonstrator

A real demonstrator exists. It shows approximately: diagnostic → gap → targeted practice → retest → capability evidence record.

No AI evaluates capability. The system currently relies on heuristic formative signals, human adjudication and an evidence workflow.

The retest result was observed after practice, in this situation. Transfer remains undemonstrated.

Student-Based Training

Initial behaviour / exploration

An elementary logic already exists: diagnostic → gap adjudicated by a person → prescribed practice → retest.

It is not a complete adaptive engine.

Cognitive Passport

Existing foundation — not yet connected

Technical foundations and models exist.

There is no complete longitudinal engine, no fully connected writing, and no complete operational product.

Next Best Learning Experience

Research direction

Nothing is implemented.

The question is asked: what should we observe next to reduce uncertainty?

We can show a public challenge that makes the problem tangible, then an interactive demo that explains how Hulotech explores an answer based on learning, evidence state and longitudinal follow-up, with a real demonstrator mostly on the Capability Evidence side.

Meet us at the show

Will you be at ALL IN?

We show what we observe and what we cannot conclude. Write to us to arrange a time on site.

Let's talk about

  • AI-assisted training
  • Human supervision
  • Modernizing learning
  • Capability Evidence
  • AI projects applied to training

ALL IN 2026 trade show

September 16–17, 2026 · Montréal

Official ALL IN 2026 website ↗